User:Robertinventor/df

__NOINDEX__

People have commented that their biggest concern with my user access being restored is that I would immediately return to what they call relitigating the original accusations against me. As Goldenring, points out, I've been clearly ordered not to and I have no plans to discuss the matter on Wikipedia outside legitimate and necessary dispute resolution, such as we are engaging in right now.

My plan for the topic ban appeal, a year from now, is to list my plans for future contributions and say, "If any admin here wishes me to address the original accusations, I am prepared to do so." I don't expect anyone will take me up on it.

In my time since the original sanction was imposed, I have taken several steps to explore conflict resolution and deescalation, with some success.

As outlined in the appeal, my plan for the next year of editing in Wikipedia is to split my activity mainly between updating Wikipedia articles from Wikinews, responding to RSN, and other matters here like 3O and RfC's. These are all areas where I have shown I can be an asset to Wikipedia in a conflict free way as you can tell from the six month history before the last appeal.

In those six months before the last appeal I also stayed far away from MoS, and anything even remotely connected, and that is what I plan to do for the next year. I am permitted to do wikignoming so long as I don't discuss the edits and in practice that causes no problems.

I accept all the conditions mentioned by Goldenring in her comment to the appeal.

If there is something else I haven't addressed here please ask and I will respond.

Tony - can you copy this over to the appeal, thanks!

=
Bullet points:


 * During the six months unblocked I never edited anywhere near